Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2005 (10) TMI 97 - SCH - Central ExciseValuation (Central Excise) - Held that - Assuming that the assessee was related to its subsidiary company i.e. M/s. Best & Crompton Ltd. (B & C.L.) this by itself would not be sufficient for the purpose of invoking the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules 1975 read with Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act 1944. The department would have to go further and show that the relationship has introduced an element other than purely commercial consideration in effecting the sale by the assessee to the BCL. No such evidence has been produced by the Revenue - Decided against Revenue.
|