Forgot password
2001 (10) TMI 291 - AT - Income Tax
Issues Involved:
1. Condonation of delay in filing appeals.
2. Validity of the order passed under section 154 by the Assessing Officer.
3. Allowability of deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I on gross total income before or after deducting interest and remuneration paid to partners.
Detailed Analysis:
1. Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals:
The assessee filed appeals with a delay of three days, which was condoned by the Tribunal after considering the reasons provided. The delay was deemed minor and justified, allowing the appeals to proceed.
2. Validity of the Order Passed Under Section 154 by the Assessing Officer:
The Tribunal examined the validity of the order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 154. The return filed by the assessee was initially processed under section 143(1)(a), allowing deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I on gross total income before deducting payments to partners. Subsequently, a notice under section 154(1)(b) was issued, and a rectification order was passed to correct the mistake. However, the Tribunal noted that the notice under section 154(1)(b) was issued after the notice under section 143(2), which is not permissible as per the Gujarat High Court's decision in Lakhanpal National Ltd. v. Dy. CIT. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the notice issued under section 154(1)(b) and the rectification order passed under section 154, rendering the other grounds raised by the assessee academic.
3. Allowability of Deductions Under Sections 80HH and 80-I:
The primary issue was whether deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I should be allowed on gross total income before or after deducting interest and remuneration paid to partners. The Assessing Officer had allowed deductions on the gross total income after deducting these payments. The CIT (Appeals) upheld this view for the assessment year 1994-95 but took a different view for the assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99, allowing deductions on gross total income before deducting these payments.
The Tribunal analyzed the arguments and contentions from both sides. It noted that the partnership firm is not a distinct legal entity but is considered a separate assessable unit under the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of section 40(b) allow deductions for interest and remuneration paid to partners from the assessment year 1993-94 onwards, and these payments are considered admissible expenses in determining the firm's income.
The Tribunal rejected the assessee's contention that these payments represent a distribution of profits and should not be deducted before computing deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I. It clarified that the gross total income, as defined in section 80B(5), means the total income computed in accordance with the provisions of the Act before making any deductions under Chapter VIA, which includes sections 80HH and 80-I. Therefore, the gross total income for the purpose of these deductions must be computed after deducting interest and remuneration paid to partners.
The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's decision for the assessment year 1994-95 and set aside the CIT (Appeals) orders for the assessment years 1997-98 and 1998-99, restoring the Assessing Officer's orders for these years.
Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the quashing of the section 154 order and the Revenue's appeals concerning the deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I. The assessee's appeal on the gross total income computation and the cross objections were dismissed. The decision reinforced the principle that deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I should be computed on the gross total income after deducting interest and remuneration paid to partners.