Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2024 (5) TMI 1033 - HC - GSTValidity of demand notice and assessment order - failure to file appeal within statutory period - availability of alternative remedy - HELD THAT - The petitioner had a statutory remedy by way of an appeal under Section 107 (4) of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act. The aforesaid provision requires an appeal to be filed within a period of three months and upon delay to be filed within a further period of one month; which could also be considered if there is satisfactory explanation for the delay occasioned. The petitioner has not availed the remedy and at this point of time cannot seek to avail the appellate remedy for reason of the limitation period having expired long prior. The Hon ble Supreme Court in IN RE COGNIZANCE FOR EXTENSION OF LIMITATION 2022 (1) TMI 385 - SC ORDER due to the pandemic situation limitation was saved between 15.03.2020 till 28.02.2022. It was also directed that an appeal could be filed within ninety days from 01.03.2022. Hence an appeal could have been filed on or before 30.05.2022 which provision was not availed by the petitioner herein. The Hon ble Supreme Court also declared that if a longer period than 90 days is provided in a Statute then that longer period will apply. Hence a delayed appeal could also have been filed on or before 30.06.2022. The present writ petition is filed on the demand notice being issued which is not permissible when there was an alternate efficacious remedy which was not availed by the petitioner for reason of his own default. There are specific contours for invocation of the extra ordinary remedy under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as has been delineated in the STATE OF HP. AND OTHERS VERSUS GUJARAT AMBUJA CEMENT LTD. AND ANOTHER (AND OTHER APPEALS) 2005 (7) TMI 353 - SUPREME COURT . No ground exists and in any event the attempt of the petitioner to bypass the appellate remedy which he chose to not avail of cannot be countenance - petition dismissed.
|