Forgot password
2008 (12) TMI 331 - HC - Income Tax
Business Income or Income from property under section 22 28 Rent The assessee was a local authority for planning development and improvement of cities and received income from rent. In this case Haryana High Court held the finding of the Tribunal the main business of the assessee was not renting of property but of development and sale of property. Hence the assessee could claim the head to be income from property instead of income from business. The appeal is dismissed. Decision in favor of assessee against the revenue.
Issues:
1. Whether rental income derived by the assessee from letting out commercial properties should be assessed as income from house property or as business income.
2. Whether the Tribunal's decision regarding the nature of the assessee's main business is correct.
Analysis:
1. The appeal before the High Court concerned the categorization of income derived from rent by the assessee. The Revenue contended that the rental income should be treated as business income due to the nature of the assessee's activities in developing and selling properties. However, the Tribunal found that the main business of the assessee was not renting out property but rather development and sale. The Tribunal noted that the rental income was being shown under the head 'Income from house property' and allowed a deduction of 30% under section 24 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that the Assessing Officer did not provide a basis for considering the rental income as business income, and since the main business of the assessee was development activities, the income from letting out properties should be treated as income from house property. The Tribunal's decision was supported by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and was in line with previous decisions.
2. The High Court, in its analysis, referred to the Supreme Court's decision in East India Housing and Land Development Trust Ltd. v. CIT [1961] 42 ITR 49, where it was held that income derived from rent could be treated as income from property and not as income from business if the main business activity was development and sale. The High Court concurred with the Tribunal's finding that the primary business of the assessee was not renting out premises but development and sale of properties. Therefore, the High Court concluded that no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal's decision. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal's decision to treat the rental income as income from house property based on the nature of the assessee's main business activities.