Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2008 (4) TMI 636 - AT - Central ExciseDemand - waiver of pre-deposit - Held that - It is not on record as to why permission was withheld and what was the reason for the revenue to direct the appellant to further await permission instead of granting the same. There is no explanation from the revenue as to why a period of almost 2 years was considered to be insufficient for the revenue authorities for grant of permission to destroy admittedly the expired medicines. In any case we find that there is no dispute as regards the destruction which was carried out in the presence of the Food and Drugs Authorities and under their directions the appellant cannot be held liable for delay on the part of the revenue s action - appeal allowed.
|