Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2009 (8) TMI 1074 - HC - VAT and Sales TaxWhether the Tribunal was justified in holding that the goods moved from other State at the instance of the assessee were earmarked for a specific works contract undertaken by the dealers and hence deduction was allowable under Section 3-B(2)(a) of the TNGST Act? Held that - When the Tribunal has rendered a factual finding based on which it had reached the conclusion that the assessee was entitled for the deduction as provided under Section 3-B(2)(a) of the Act there is no scope for this Court to interfere with the said factual finding in the absence of any serious illegality committed by the Tribunal in analysing the material evidence placed before it by the assessee; may be for the first time; while dealing with the appeal before the Tribunal. We therefore do not find any merit in this revision. The tax case revision fails and the same is dismissed.
|