Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2014 (4) TMI 1146 - AT - Central ExciseDemand - Clandestine manufacture and removal of non-alloy steel ingots - there were lying 45 ingots as against the production of only 37 ingots weighing 3.920 M.T.s shown in the log sheet - appellants had increased the capacity of their furnace in December 2003 from 4 M.T.s per heat to 5 M.T.s per heat - Held that - the revenue in their present appeal has not been able to introduce any evidence to show the clandestine manufacture and clearance of the ingots in question. On going through the impugned order I find that the appellate authority has passed a detailed order dealing with each and every aspect. In fact the entire case of the revenue is based upon the sole ground that on the day of visit of the officers 8 ingots in excess of the bar heat number of ingots were found lying therein. The charges of clandestine removal cannot be upheld on the above basis without any corroborative evidence. - Decided against the Revenue
|