Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2018 (7) TMI 2160 - HC - Income TaxComputation of deduction u/s 10AA - expenses and foreign exchange loss reduced from the Export Turnover has to be reduced from the Total Turnover - HELD THAT - In the case of CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd 2011 (8) TMI 782 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT has held that charges/expenses relating to telecommunication insurance charges and foreign exchange loss should be excluded both from export turnover and total turnover while computing deduction u/s.10A of the Act i.e. whatever is removed from the numerator should also be excluded from the denominator while working total turnover and export turnover for allowing deduction u/s.10A. The aforesaid decision of the jurisdictional High Court has been upheld in the case of CIT v. HCL Technologies Ltd.. 2018 (5) TMI 357 - SUPREME COURT . The telecommunication charges should be excluded both from the export turnover as well as total turnover while computing deduction u/s.10AA of the Act. TP Adjustment - comparable selection - substantial question of law - HELD THAT - Whether the comparables have been rightly picked up or not Filters for arriving at the correct list of comparables have been rightly applied or not do not in our considered opinion give rise toany substantial question of law. The present appeals filed by the Revenue do not give rise to any substantial question of law and the suggested substantial questions of law do not meet the requirements of Section 260-A of the Act and thus the appeals filed by the Revenue are found to be devoid of merit and the same are liable to be dismissed. The same yardsticks and parameters will have to be applied even if such appeals are filed by the Assessees because there may be cases where the Tribunal giving its own reasons and findings has found certain comparables to be good comparables to arrive at an Arm s Length Price in the case of the assessees with which the assessees may not be satisfied and have filed such appeals before this Court. Therefore we clarify that mere dissatisfaction with the findings of facts arrived at by the learned Tribunal is not at all a sufficient reason to invoke Section 260-A of the Act before this Court.
|