Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2010 (1) TMI 1282 - HC - Indian LawsDishonour of Cheque - money lending business - legally enforceable debt or not - whether a person can be debarred from filing and prosecuting complaint u/s 138 if he is doing business of money lending without holding a valid licence - HELD THAT - Since explanation to Section 138 of the N.I. Act clearly stipulated that the debt or liability means legally enforceable debt or other liability the claim by money lender against her borrower without production of valid and operative money lending license covering period of transaction was unenforceable claim u/s 138 of the N.I. Act was bound to be dismissed. The complainant moneylender despite availing of sufficient opportunity in the trial Court could not produce valid and operative money lending license at the time of transaction of loan hence dismissal of complaint can not be faulted as the complainant failed to establish legally enforceable debt or liability of the accused. Hence this Court is of the considered view that the complainant could not establish her case against the accused so as to bring home the guilt on the part of the accused. The cheque in question was not issued to discharge loan enforceable according to law and therefore notwithstanding that it was dishonoured by nonpayment of loan remaining unpaid despite demand notice in writing it cannot came within the purview of Section 138 of the N.I. Act. As such it would not be possible for this Court to reverse the acquittal and to fasten criminal liability upon the accused u/s 138 of the N.I. Act. The Appeal is therefore dismissed.
|