Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2017 (9) TMI 1935 - AT - Income TaxEstimation of income - bogus purchases - CIT(A) restricted the addition to 10% of the amount of bogus purchases - HELD THAT - Hon ble Bombay High Court In CIT Vs. Nikunj Eximp Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. 2013 (1) TMI 88 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT has held that merely because the suppliers had not appeared before the Assessing Officer or the CIT (A) one could not conclude that the purchases were not made by the respondent/assessee. The Hon ble Gujrat High Court in CIT vs. Simit P. Seth 2013 (10) TMI 1028 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT upheld the decision of the Tribunal and sustained the addition 12.5% of the total bogus purchases holding that only profit element embedded in such purchases can be added to income of the assessee. We uphold the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) and in the interest of justice restrict the addition to 10% of the total amount of bogus purchases made by the assessee during the year relevant to the assessment year under consideration. We accordingly dismiss all the grounds of the appeal of the revenue and direct the AO to compute the addition in terms of this order.
|