Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
2023 (12) TMI 1207 - AT - Central ExciseCalculation of Excise duty - includability of the sales tax concession retained by the Appellant in the assessable value for the purpose of levy of Central Excise duty - suppression of facts or not - extended period of limitation - penalty - HELD THAT - The Appellant has not suppressed any information from the department. There were decisions of the Tribunals that the sales tax concession retained by the assesses is not required to be added in the assessable value for the purpose of levy of Central Excise duty. Thus it is observed that the appellant cannot be faulted for not including the same in the assessable value. As there is no evidence of suppression of facts available on record it is held that the demand confirmed by invoking the extended period is liable to be set aside. In the present case it is observed that the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority has failed to show any positive act of suppression on the part of the Appellant. The details of VAT collected and retained are reflected in the audited Profit Loss account and balance sheet of the impugned periods. Therefore we hold that extended period of limitation as provided under section 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act 1944 cannot be invoked for recovery of the short paid duties. The Circular issued by the Board also supports this view. Following the above Circular issued by the Board the extended period cannot be invoked in this case to demand duty. Accordingly penalty also not imposable in this case. The appeal is disposed by way of remand for calculating the duty payable for the normal period of limitation with consequential relief if any as per law.
|