Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2025 (3) TMI 1396 - SCH - Indian LawsModification of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission s (NCDRC) order by awarding an increased interest rate of 15% per annum on the refund amount - delay on the part of the respondent in not completing the construction within the agreed period - HELD THAT - The NCDRC having taken note of the relevant aspects including the factum of delay and the fact that petitioner had opted for refund of money deposited rightly held that as a home buyer petitioner cannot be compelled to take possession of the flat after such long time and as such ordered for refund of entire amount deposited with interest of 9% p.a. Placing reliance on the law laid down by this Court in Bangalore Development Authority v. Syndicate Bank 2007 (5) TMI 565 - SUPREME COURT wherein a coordinate Bench of this Court dealing with the question of grant of relief to a consumer in cases of delay of delivery of possession held that when possession of the allotted plot/flat/house is not delivered within the specified time the allottee is entitled to a refund of the amount paid with reasonable interest thereon from the date of payment till the date of refund. In the present case the High Court by the impugned order modified the finding of NCDRC and awarded interest @ 15% p.a. primarily relying upon the judgment of this Court in Rohit Chaudhary and another v. Vipul Ltd. 2023 (9) TMI 1569 - SUPREME COURT wherein this Court in order to balance the equities and to compensate the loss caused to the purchaser/complainant who had booked an office premise for his use directed the refund of the amount paid along with interest @ 12% p.a. from the date of complaint till the date of payment. However the issue in the instant case relates to allotment of a 3 BHK flat after payment of sale consideration and delay in delivery of same. As such the NCDRC considering the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case had awarded interest @ 9% p.a. which in our view was fair and reasonable. The interest @ 15% p.a. awarded by High Court is excessive. Therefore the impugned order hereby is setaside and the order dated 27.07.2022 passed by NCDRC in so far as it relates to award of interest @ 9% on the respective deposit till the date of actual payment is restored. Conclusion - i) The NCDRC s award of 9% interest per annum is deemed fair and reasonable considering the complainant s choice for a refund and the delay in possession. ii) The High Court s enhancement of interest to 15% per annum is excessive and not justified under the circumstances. iii) The compensation amount is reduced from Rs. 10, 00, 000 to Rs. 7, 50, 000 to balance the interests of justice considering the appellant s status as a state instrumentality. The appeal stands partly allowed.
|