TMI Blog2015 (9) TMI 426X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ax X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tion made by the AO. I hasten to add that the amount mentioned in the grounds of appeal at Rs. 79,20,240/- includes management fee for work done for the Hongkong company as well as for the US company". 3. The AR submitted that as per the order of CIT(A), the issue of management fee was applicable for SJMH as well as SJMI. 4. Based on this undisputed finding of the CIT(A), which was sustained, Pa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... entioned that transaction involved the receipt of management fee from AE during the year ended 31.03.2002. The AR pointed out that the assessee had declared the same in the TP report in identification of revenues, which showed that 79,20,240/- pertained to SJMH and SJMI. It was also pointed out that it was declared and the same was accepted by the TPO vide order u/s 92CA(3) dated 28.02.2005 and fo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... re the AO, because in the Profit & Loss Account submitted, it showed the receipt of Rs. 9,60,57,310/- which included Rs. 79,20,240/- under the head management fee for marketing support at Rs. 79,20,240/- (APB 7 & 12)". 8. Para 44 of the order would read as: "44. We, therefore, are of the opinion, that all the requisite details were placed before the AO, along with the return on income, which bas ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|