Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be fully migrated on 31-July-2025 at 23:59:59
After this date, all services will be available exclusively on our new platform.
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please let us know
via our feedback form
, with specific details, so we can address them promptly.
Home
1959 (3) TMI 2 - SC - Income TaxWhether the circumstances reasonably supported the Income-tax Officer s presumption that the appellant had converted his secret profits into jewellery gold and sovereigns with a view to camouflage his transactions and brought such profits in his accounts by re-sale of such jewellery etc. and remittances through bank drafts? Whether in the circumstances of the case Yamnabai could have in her possession jewellery etc. to the tune of Rs. 1, 60, 000. Held that - The whole of the inference drawn by the Appellate Tribunal in this behalf was allegedly based on no material whatever and was submitted to be at best a suspicion or a conjecture which warped the reasoning of the Appellate Tribunal. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal is a fact finding Tribunal and if it arrives at its own conclusions of fact after due consideration of the evidence before it this court will not interfere. The conclusions reached by the Tribunal should not be coloured by any irrelevant considerations or matters of prejudice and if there are any circumstances which required to be explained by the assessee the assessee should be given an opportunity of doing so. On no account whatever should the Tribunal base its findings on suspicions conjectures or surmises nor should it act on no evidence at all or on improper rejection of material and relevant evidence or partly on evidence and partly on suspicions conjectures or surmises and if it does anything of the sort its findings even though on questions of fact will be liable to be set aside by this court. Set aside the order of the Appellate Tribunal and remand the matter back to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Madras A Bench to reconsider the same in accordance with law in the light of the observations made above. Appeal allowed. Case remanded.
|