TMI Blog1987 (11) TMI 348X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h the petitioner No. 2, N.K. Industries, claims to belong to it were being transported through the petitioner No. 1, M/s. Reliable Roadways, and were seized at a check post barrier. Ultimately, on the ground that a breach of sub-section (8) of section 29-A of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 had been committed, a penalty in the sum of Rs. 1,05,600 was imposed. It is this order along with conse ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gned order, the petitioners should be required to pursue the said remedy and no decision in regard to the validity of the order of imposition of penalty is needed at this stage in the present writ petition. 4.. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed without going into the merits of the impugned order of penalty on the ground that the petitioners should pursue the revision which they have ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|