HC set aside the appellate authority's order dated 11th ...

Judicial Intervention Mandates Fresh Review of Tax Refund Claim, Ensuring Fair Hearing and Potential Full Credit

May 24, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC set aside the appellate authority's order dated 11th December, 2023 rejecting the petitioner's refund application. The court remanded the matter for fresh hearing, directing the appellate authority to conduct a de novo review within three weeks, assign a different officer, and provide the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. If the refund is found valid, the entire amount must be credited to the petitioner's ledger with appropriate statutory interest. The court criticized the respondents' procedural approach, highlighting the petitioner's registration restoration and subsequent refund claim's unjust rejection.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC set aside the appellate authority's order dated 11th ...

Judicial Intervention Mandates Fresh Review of Tax Refund Claim, Ensuring Fair Hearing and Potential Full Credit

May 24, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

HC ruled that pursuant to clause (5) of Section 16 inserted by Finance (No.2) Act, 2024 and the circular dated 15.10.2024, the respondents' orders are set aside. The...

Procedure relating to sanction, post-audit and review of refund claims - Guidelines issued to ensure uniformity in issuance of speaking order for refund - Details...

Refund claim of service tax paid - classification of services - Claiming a refund of the amount paid as tax as per their understanding of law cannot be disputed now -...

Claim of Refund - Post GST, on demand, appellant paid service tax under reverse charge basis and claim refund as the same is eligible as Input Tax Credit under the...

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

HC adjudicated a dispute concerning IGST refund involving an inadvertent GST number error in a Shipping Bill. The court found that despite the initial mismatch in...

HC quashed the summary order in GST DRC-07 for procedural irregularities, specifically violation of natural justice principles. The court found the tax authority passed...

Refund of accumulated input tax credit - relevant date for the purpose of considering the limitation u/s 54 - The High Court addressed this issue by directing the...

HC adjudicates tax dispute, granting petitioner 30 days to submit comprehensive documentary evidence supporting reply to show cause notice. The court mandates...

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

HC allowed the petition, directing re-adjudication of ITC refund claims for February 2021 to February 2022. The court held that Notification No. 14/2022 is clarificatory...

HC set aside the tax notice (N/N. 56/2023) due to procedural irregularities in service of Show Cause Notice (SCN). The court found fundamental violations of natural...

HC allows petitioner's claim for input tax credit (ITC) refund on zero-rated services, holding that registration without specific service category details does not...

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that refund claim for service tax under section 65 of Finance Act, 1994 was not time-barred as the relevant date for refund claim was the date of...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Quick Updates: