Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 1999 (8) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1999 (8) TMI 742 - SC - Indian LawsWhether on refusal of the injunction the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss and injury keeping in view the strength of the parties case? Held that:- Appeal allowed. As a matter of fact there is no evidence of single consumer being misled and not a whisper as to what constitute an unfair trade practice pertaining to ‘Suraksha Chakra’. The Commission also thought it fit not to record any reason or justification for the grant of an interim order of injunction in spite of finding as above and before the matter is investigated and complaint is finally heard. This apart, the factum of non-availability of any explanation of more than 13 years delay has also not been delayed into by the Commission at all.In that view of the matter question of there being any order of injunction at this stage of the proceeding on the face of the finding as passed by the Commission itself does not and cannot arise.
|