Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals Articles SMS News Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases FEMA HC FEMA - HC
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

FEMA - High Court - Case Laws

Showing 1 to 20 of 363 Records

  • 2018 (4) TMI 1110 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    Dinesh Kothari & Ors. Versus Union of India & Ors.

    Violation of the declared FDI Policy - Held that - Enforcement Directorate has taken action against the violators. The Enforcement Directorate has also filed a counter affidavit pointing out that it is inquiring into e-commerce entities which are guided by self gain or motive other than in public interest and that the Bangalore Zonal office of the answering respondent had initiated enquiries against ten (10) e-commerce entities and in 5 out of th....... + More


  • 2018 (4) TMI 421 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    United India Airways Ltd & Anr. Versus Chief Enforcement Officer, Enforcement Directorate

    Violation of Section 9(1)(e) of Foreign Exchange Regulations Act, 1973 - failure to comply with the mandatory requirement of Section 61(2) of FERA - Held that - The subject complaint was filed on 29.05.2002. Since petitioners were never granted an opportunity, as mandated by Section 61(2) of FERA, there is clearly a breach of the mandate of law. Since the requirements of Section 61(2) of FERA have not been complied with, reliance placed by the re....... + More


  • 2018 (4) TMI 162 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

    Esab India Limited Versus Union of India, Director of Enforcement, Department of Revenue

    Order passed by an officer coram non judice - gross violation of the principles of natural justice. These orders have been passed without complying with the statutory requirements - Held that - Though a writ of certiorari can be issued by this court despite the presence of alternate and equally efficacious remedy, that is not a prohibition or rule, but a matter of prudence, still, whether to issue such a writ or not depends upon the facts and cir....... + More


  • 2018 (3) TMI 1251 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    CPIO, Directorate of Enforcement, New Delhi and Anr. Versus Mr. Bimal Kumar Bhattacharya

    Public authority excluded from the purview of Right to Information Act - Held that - Section 24(1) of the Act expressly excludes intelligence and security organizations specified in the Second Schedule of the Act from the purview of the Act. Admittedly, the Directorate of Enforcement is included in the Second Schedule to the Act and, thus, cannot be called upon to disclose information under the provisions of the Act. The only exception carved out....... + More


  • 2018 (3) TMI 1067 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

    Gurnihal Singh Pirzada Versus Directorate of Enforcement And Others

    Working of Special Investigation Team ( SIT ) questioned - As submitted SIT especially the Directorate of Enforcement ( ED ) is acting in contravention and beyond the orders of this Court which was supposed to investigate the dispute of M/s International Customer Related Management Services Pvt. Ltd. (for short, ICRMS ) and rather it has plunged into third party disputes - Held that - In the light of unison shown by the learned counsel representi....... + More


  • 2018 (3) TMI 119 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    Bimal Kumar Jain Versus Directorate Of Enforcement

    Violation of provisions of FEMA - cross-examination of the witnesses other than the IO - Held that - The application made to the Special Director in the course of proceedings in this case (dated 21.12.2017), is part of the record. No doubt, the appellant sought the Investigating Officer s cross-examination inasmuch as, according to him, examination as to the conclusion in his report was necessary. - The appellant, at the same time requested for c....... + More


  • 2018 (2) TMI 1682 - MADRAS HIGH COURT

    Pradeep D. Kothari Versus The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Commissioner of Customs (Appeals-I) , Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    Order of seizure in terms of provisions of Section 37A(1) of FEMA - foreign exchange worth USD 352258.25 suspected to be held outside India in contravention of Section 4 of FEMA - Held that - The petitioner filed an additional affidavit dated 08.01.2018 placing certain factual details regarding the amount, which was lying in the foreign Bank account in 2002. Along with the additional affidavit, the petitioner has enclosed copy of the letters of H....... + More


  • 2018 (2) TMI 762 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

    Lalit Kumar Modi Versus Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Others

    Right to cross-examine - Cross examine the witnesses whose statements were recorded under Section 37 of FEMA and whose statements have been relied upon in the complaint - complaint alleges that the provisions of section 3(b) of the FEMA have been contravened by the petitioner by making a payment to Cricket South Africa (CSA) a person residing outside India, without permission of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and that is inter alia apparent from....... + More


  • 2018 (2) TMI 333 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    Bimal Kumar Jain Versus The Directorate of Enforcement

    Offence under FEMA - reject the petitioner s application for cross-examination - Held that - A plain reading of the application filed by the petitioner seeking cross-examination of certain individuals named above also indicates that the petitioner had reiterated its contention that the material or evidence on record does not substantiate the allegation made against him. At the outset, the petitioner had denied all the allegations made against him....... + More


  • 2018 (1) TMI 568 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

    Union of India Through Competent Authority Versus Abbasbhai Mulla Fazle Abbas And 10

    Brother of the present respondent was detained under the provisions COFEPOSA Act - Held that - No substance in any such ground for the simple reason that the law is well settled as interpreted and decided by the Honourable Supreme Court. The petitioner has also tried to compare several other judgments and Special Act like TADA and NDPS Act to plead and to induce by this Court to believe that it would be difficult to get direct evidence to control....... + More


  • 2018 (1) TMI 221 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    Silicon Graphics Systems India Private Limited Versus Special Director of Enforcement & Ors.

    Application for dispensation and directing appellant to deposit 10 of the penalty amount and to furnish a credible security for the balance 50 - Held that - On the one hand the appellant contends its financial credibility and on the other hand undue economic hardship. The Tribunal has waived off substantial pre-deposit and has directed only 10 of the penalty amount to be deposited with a surety for the balance 50 which cannot be said to be undue ....... + More


  • 2017 (12) TMI 396 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT

    Union of India Versus Shri Yogesh Mehta And Another, Sh. Hemal Thakkar

    Revisional jurisdiction under the FERA - Notice of contravention of Section 51 of FERA was taken by the Adjudicating officer within two years from the date of the repeal of FERA - Held that - In the facts of the present case, the appellant is not without a remedy in the sense that a recourse can be taken to the remedies under the Constitution of India. The principle which governs Mimansa interpretation is that if a word or sentence purporting to ....... + More


  • 2017 (10) TMI 1129 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

    Shri D. Venugopal S/o D.V. Prasad, Devas Multimedia Private Limited, Shri M. Umesh Versus The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, The Special Director, Directorate of Enforcement

    Investigation and enquiry into violation of FEMA and the Rules and Regulations - Held that - Any investigation undertaken with an intention to unearth violations of provisions of FEMA cannot be characterized as motivated or malicious merely because before initiation of such proceeding, an award had been passed against the Central Government regarding alleged breach of contract entered into between the Government and the Company. Alleged breach of....... + More


  • 2017 (10) TMI 909 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    Dr. R.N. Gupta Technical Educational Society Versus Union of India

    Registration under Section 12 of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 ( FCRA ) rejected - Grant of certificate of registration under FCRA - the respondent is not satisfied that the foreign contribution is not likely to be used for personal gains - petitioner is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and has been registered under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act - Held that - The question whether a society esta....... + More


  • 2017 (10) TMI 461 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    Nitin Sandesara Versus Directorate of Enforcement And Ors.

    Detention at the airport at the instance of the Enforcement Directorate - Look Out Circular (LOC) was issued by the Enforcement Directorate - violation of FEMA - Proceedings under PMLA - Held that - In the present case, the LOC does not indicate any credible reason for issuing the same. Plainly, recourse to LOC cannot be taken as a matter of course; restricting the right of a citizen to travel is a serious imposition on his/her fundamental rights....... + More


  • 2017 (10) TMI 352 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

    M/s Wood Tech Consultants Private Limited Versus Joint Director of Enforcement Office of The Joint Director of Enforcement, Government of India

    Partially dispensing with deposit of the penalty amount - order passed exercising the power under second proviso to Section 19(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Held that - It is relevant to state that an appeal would lie to the High Court under Section 35 of the Act on any question of law arising out of the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal. On the facts of the case, it can t be said that the discretion exercised by the Appe....... + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 491 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    M/s. Lord Chloro Alkali Versus Special Director Enforcement Directorate

    Offence under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - penalty imposed - reason to believe for default - Held that - From the perusal of the SCN, it is clear that the, details furnished by the respondent department in the SCN, were vague and sketchy at best, for the appellant to trace back the contentious transaction of DM16000, which happened eight years back with respect to the time when the first letter was sent to the appellant Company by the ....... + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 127 - DELHI HIGH COURT

    Rajendra Kumar Patel Versus Union Of India

    Interest on the amount of the Award - Payment of actual rate of interest earned by the respondent on the amount seized and confiscated from the petitioner - accretion to the amount seized from the petitioner - Held that - In the present case it is admitted that the respondent had received interest amounting to ₹1,64,52,470/- on the separate fixed deposit created from the currency seized. However, it is seen that the respondent has paid only....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 1016 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT

    N.L. Dubasia & 1 Versus Union of India THR' & 2

    Provision of Section 78 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 and Section 44 of the Act applicability - Held that - The petitioner who had come to India from foreign country, wanted that their NRI Account/FCNR Account may be continued in the same status. It was a kind of privilege claimed. Such status could be accorded only within the permissible parameters and in accordance with law by the Reserve Bank of India. It is difficult to conceiv....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 423 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

    N. Pandu Ranga Versus The Asst. Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Another

    Alternative remedy of appeal - Guilty for contravention of the provisions of Section 3(c) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Held that - When the statutory alternative remedy of appeal is available, the High Court should not entertain an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. When a right or liability is created by the statute, the High Court must insist that before availing remedy under Article 226 of the Constit....... + More


1........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 
 


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version