Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Manuals News SMS Articles Highlights
        Home        
Case Laws
Home Case Index All Cases Customs Tri Customs - Tri This
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Customs - Tribunal - Case Laws

Showing 1 to 20 of 20270 Records

  • 2018 (5) TMI 1307

    Valuation of imported goods - television sets - rejection of declared value - enhancement of value - rule 9 of Customs Valuation (Determination Of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 - non-compliance with the compulsory registration scheme - absolute confiscation - penalties. - Whether the television sets are liable to confiscation under section 111 of Customs Act, 1962 for non-compliance with the compulsory registration scheme of the Bureau of ....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1306

    Classification of imported goods - projectors - appellants claimed classification under CTH 85286100 as Projectors solely or principally used with Automatic Data Processing Machines while Department was of the view that the imported goods merit classification under 85286900 as they have some additional features - benefit of N/N. 24/2005 Cus. dated 01.03.2005 as well as successor Notifications 69/2004-cus. dated 09.07.2004 and 28/2007-cus. dated 0....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1248

    Exemption from SAD - N/N. 53/2003-Cus. - Duty Free Credit Entitlement scheme - contention of the Department is that during the period of import i.e. from 01.03.2006 to 18.12.2006 the SAD was not exempted under N/N. 53/2003-Cus. therefore debited in respect of SAD (Special Additional Duty of Customs) made by the appellant is incorrect to that extent the appellant is liable to pay the Customs duty. - Held that - there is alternative exemption notif....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1247

    Exemption to goods imported under N/N. 21/2002-Cus. Sr. No. 230 - Interpretation of statute - case of Revenue is that Commissioner (Appeals) has wrongly interpreted Notification No. 21/2002 by construing that Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (MMRDA) is a road construction corporation under the control of the State Government. - Held that - the contracts awarded by MMRDA do not qualify for the exemption. - In the case of Rajhoo B....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1246

    SAD Refund - N/N. 102/97-Cus. - Jurisdiction - refund applied before wrong officer - Held that - Special Additional Duty (SAD) @ 4% was introduced to provide a level playing field to the domestic manufacturers who suffer VAT (which is not leviable on the imports). If the imported goods are further sold on payment of VAT, the SAD is refunded as per the notification 102/97-Cus. - The technical fault of the assessee in applying for the refund to the....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1245

    Penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling of Gold - Baggage Rules - Jurisdiction - Held that - the present case related to baggage and therefore the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to entertain such cases. The Revisionary Authority at Delhi has got the power to decide such cases - the appeal is dismissed being not maintainable........ + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1244

    Classification of imported goods - Hover Board - whether classified under CTH 9506 or under CTH 8711? - Held that - Chapter 95 covers toys whereas chapter 87 deals with all kinds of motor vehicles other than Railway or tramway and rolling stock - as regards the disputed item, it is an electrically powered two wheeled transportation device designed to be used at low speed, for transportation of one person. As such from the size of the item, it is ....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1243

    Refund claim - rejected on the ground that the appellant cannot claim the refund directly without challenging the assessment order (bill of entry), in view of the Apex Court decision in the case of Priya Blue Industries ltd. vs. Commissioner 2004 (9) TMI 105 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ? - Held that - in the present case, there is no lis between the Department and the appellant in claiming the benefit of N/N. 52/2011 - the impugned order denying the....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1149

    Penalty u/s 114A and 114AA of CA, 1962 - Valuation of imported goods - enhancement of value on the basis of contemporaneous import - Held that - No evidence was found that the appellants have suppressed the value and additional consideration was paid by some other means. Since the assessment was finalized in the Bills of Entry itself and duty was paid on the enhanced value, therefore, there was no reason to issue the show-cause notice. The show-c....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1147

    Benefit of N/N. 1(RE-2008)/2004-09 dated 11.4.2008 - Failure of customs authorities to issue notification on time - while policy was amended w.e.f. 1.4.2008, the notification of customs implementing the said change was issued on 9.5.2008 also 39 days after the issue of DGFT notification. - Held that - it is apparent that when the EXIM Policy was amended and notified the Government has taken the decision of revised customs duty under the EPCG from....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1146

    Refund of SAD - SCN issued on the ground that the imported goods were sold to various units in Dadra/ Silvassa and have not paid sales tax as all sales were made against sales tax form - Held that - as per the terms of the declaration of the Notification in question, in order to avail exemption the declaration to the effect is that sale of the goods will not be effected from a place located in an area where no tax is chargeable on sale or purchas....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1145

    Exemption from anti-dumping duty - N/N. 72/2005-Cus dated 22.7.2005 and N/N. 73/2003-Cus dated 1.5.2003 - import of Glazed/Polished Procelain tiles - denial of exemption on the ground that he goods were not manufactured by M/s Southern Building Materials and Sanitary Co. Ltd. - Held that - on going through the statement of Shri K.M. Alexender, Sr. Manager of Gera Development Pvt. Ltd., the assessee in the present case, it is found that Shri Alexe....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1144

    Stay on imposition of Redemption Fine - permission to take the vessel ABAN-IV out of India for the purpose of undertaking petroleum operation - Held that - Redemption fine is an option which the applicant can choose not to exercise. No time limit has been prescribed in the impugned order for exercising the option. It is understood that staying the imposition of redemption fine would results in applicant getting full custody of the rig, which is t....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1143

    Valuation of imported goods - enhancement of value - finalization of provisional assessment - Jurisdiction of officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence to issue notice for finalisation of assessment - Held that - Finalization of provisional assessment, and of assessment including re-assessment, under section 17 and 18 of Customs Act, 1962 is within the exclusive competence of the proper officer ; in the impugned order, the Commissioner of C....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1142

    DEPB credit - mis-declaration of value of export goods to avail excess DEPB credit - Held that - It is settled position of law that value of transactions of export/import are required to be done on the basis of the transaction value, as per Section 14 - In the present case, reasons for rejection of transaction value are not clearly forthcoming. It appears to us that the transaction value has been rejected only on the basis of the market enquires ....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1141

    Classification of imported goods - Projectors - whether classified under CTH 85286100 as Projectors solely or principally used with Automatic Data Processing Machines or under 85286100 as the imported goods have features which are in addition to those which are normally found in goods covered under 85286100? - N/N. 24/2005 Cus. dated 01.03.2005 - Held that - In the case of Casio India Co. Pvt. Ltd. 2016 (12) TMI 379 - CESTAT NEW DELHI the Delhi B....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1070

    Validity of SCN - Time limitation - Regulation 20 (1) of CBLR 2013 - penalty - the time limits specified under Regulation 20(1) as well as Regulation 20(7) has not been complied with. - Held that - The more significant issue to be considered is whether the proceedings initiated under CBLR 2013 will be vitiated if the time limits are not strictly observed - it was seen that the proceedings cannot be held to be vitiated only for the reason that the....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1069

    Import of Hazardous goods - old and used picture tubes - Absolute Confiscation - penalty. - Held that - Picture tubes being the Cathode Ray Tubes can well be categorized under the MoEF Rules as hazardous waste. It, therefore, stands established on record that the description of the goods imported is misdeclared and once these are proved to be old and used goods, their import is restricted export in accordance with the provisions of FTP, ITC and t....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1068

    Penalty u/s 112(a) and 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 on appellant-courier company - mis-declaration of the chattons imported for various importers and fictitious company - Held that - the role played by the appellant herein, does not indicate that they had wilfully or knowingly, made wrong declarations in the courier bills of entry, The only findings which the adjudicating authority relies for imposing penalty, is that the appellant failed to cros....... + More


  • 2018 (5) TMI 1067

    Penalty on CHA - Regulation 20(7) and 18 of Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations (CBLR), 2013 - illegal export of suspected ephedrine hydrochloride a controlled substance under NDPS Act in two consignments concealed in ladies purses and wallets - Held that - investigation has not brought forth any clinching evidence to show that the appellant herein who is a customs broker was aware of the concealment of controlled substance or abetted the expor....... + More


1........
 
 
 
Discussion Forum
what is new what is new
 


Let's just recapitulate:

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.