Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Case Laws
Home Case Index Central Excise SC Central Excise - SC
Law
Court
Citation -
Landmark
Order by
 

 

Central Excise - Supreme Court - Case Laws

Showing 1 to 20 of 3104 Records

  • 2017 (10) TMI 660 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Bangalore Versus M/s Karnataka Soaps & Detergents Ltd.

    Excisability - agarbathi perfume also called as odoriferous compound which is used in manufacture of agarbathis sold in the market - Whether the Board s Circular No.495/61/99-CX.3, dated 22.11.1999 exempts payment of excise duty on perfumery compound manufactured by the respondent? - Held that - The Board vide its circular clarified that such odoriferous compound mixed with dough is not excisable - The circular clarifies that odoriferous substanc....... + More


  • 2017 (10) TMI 215 - SUPREME COURT

    M/s Himgiri Plastics Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi

    SSI exemption - use of brand name - Notification No. 8/2003-CE - exclusion of export turnover - the decision in the case of M/s Himgiri Plastics, Sh. Joginder Kumar Talwar, Partner, Sh. Sanjeev Talwar, Partner, M/s Himalayan Poly Colours, Smt. Neelam Talwar, Partner, M/s Himalayan Poly Colours, Smt. Rimmi Talwar, Partner - M/s Himalayan Poly Colours, Sh. Puneet Talwar Versus CCE, Delhi 2016 (11) TMI 228 - CESTAT NEW DELHI contested, where it was ....... + More


  • 2017 (10) TMI 135 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Versus Tycon Automation Pvt. Ltd. And Anr.

    Misdeclaration of value - Interest - Penalty - Rule 6 of the Valuation Rules, 2000 - the decision in the case of Tycon Automation Private Ltd., Shri Dinesh Kumar Bhardwaj, Tycon Automation Pvt. Ltd. Versus C.C.E., Noida 2016 (12) TMI 1456 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD contested - Notices issued........ + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 1256 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Central Excise Versus Kei Industries Limited

    Condonation of delay - Maintainability of appeal - project import - the decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax Versus Kei Industries Limited 2017 (4) TMI 942 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT contested - Held that - delay condoned - leave granted........ + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 706 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune Versus M/s. Abhishek Cotspin Mills Ltd.

    Exemption Notification 8/97 dated 1.3.1997 - eligibility for benefit - imported paper cones used for winding of yarn - the decision in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-II Versus Abhishek Cotspin Mills Ltd. 2016 (8) TMI 979 - CESTAT MUMBAI contested, where it was held that paper cones are packing materials, and were permitted to import the same as such without payment of duty - Held that - the decision in the above case upheld - ap....... + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 705 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh Versus M/s Winsome Yarns Ltd. Etc.

    Condonation of delay - 100 EOU - denial of eligibility for concession - demand of duty - the decision in the case of M/s Winsome Yarns Ltd., Shri Manish Bagrodia, M.D., Shri N.K. Maheshwari, Director and Shri S.K. Sharma, V.P. Versus CCE, Chandigarh 2016 (10) TMI 608 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH contested, where it was held that appellant eligible to claim exemption - Held that - delay not condoned - The appeals are dismissed on the ground of delay as wel....... + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 620 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

    Chandpaklal Ramanlal Shah And Anr. Versus Reliance Industries Ltd.

    Evasion of duty - CENVAT credit - omission of Rule 56A - Held that - The ingredient of the offence is the evasion. The omission of a procedural rule for availing the credit cannot in any manner affect the said charge. The prosecution cannot be deprived of opportunity to prove evasion which by itself is an offence. In this view of the matter, there was no justification for the High Court to quash the charge merely on the ground of Rule 56A having ....... + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 619 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Service Tax Commissionerate Noida Versus M/s. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

    Condonation of delay - Refund claim - the decision in the case of Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate, Noida Versus M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. 2017 (9) TMI 590 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT contested - Held that - Delay condoned - Leave granted........ + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 618 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh Versus M/s Nova Industries (P) Ltd Etc. Etc.

    SSI Exemption - Clubbing of clearances - Clandestine removal of goods - the decision in the case of M/s. Nova Industries (P) Ltd. Versus CCE- Chandigarh 2015 (5) TMI 99 - CESTAT NEW DELHI contested - Held that - Application for exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order is allowed - Issue notice on the application for condonation of delay as well as in appeal........ + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 416 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Customs And Central Excise Versus M/s Ambuja Cement Ltd

    Condonation of delay - Cement and clinker - whether the cement cleared by the appellant to the customers covered under serial No.1C of the N/N. 4/2006-CE dated 01.03.2006 read with Standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 and whether such consumers can be categorized as institutional or industrial consumer? - the decision in the case of Ambuja Cements Ltd. Versus C.C.E. Raipur 2017 (1) TMI 1130 - CESTAT NEW DELHI conte....... + More


  • 2017 (9) TMI 415 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Central Excise, Nashik & Pune Versus M/s Rakhoh Enterprises

    Denial of the benefit of N/N. 6/2006, dated 1-3-2006 - anchor rings and load spreading plates - the decision in the case of Rakhoh Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune 2016 (11) TMI 1207 - CESTAT MUMBAI contested - Held that - In deciding the issue of entitlement of the respondent Assessee to the benefit of exemption under the Notification in question (No.6/2006 dated 1st March, 2006) the Tribunal has relied upon the decision o....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 1091 - SUPREME COURT

    V.E. Commercial Vehicle Ltd. Versus Union of India

    Lapsing of credit of duty lying unutilised with the manufacturer from a specified date - decision in the case of M/s SML Isuzu Ltd. & Anr. V.E. Commercial Vehicle Ltd. & Anr. Versus Union of India & Anr 2016 (7) TMI 1074 - DELHI HIGH COURT contested, where it was held that Scope of judicial review in respect of fiscal legislation is limited to the extent of determining whether it is outside the legislative competence of the legislatur....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 883 - SUPREME COURT

    Thejo Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner

    Condonation of delay - Maintainability of appeal - case of Revenue is that the appeal is not maintainable insofar as it relates to determination of question having relation to rate of duty - the decision in the case of Thejo Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commr. OF C. Ex., Chennai-II 2015 (7) TMI 1229 - MADRAS HIGH COURT contested - Held that - The special leave petition is dismissed on the ground of delay........ + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 822 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Surana Telecom Ltd.

    Classification of goods - Integrated Fixed Wireless Terminals CDMA-2000-1X (ETS 2288) - whether appellant is eligible to avail benefit of exemption notification no.6/2003-CE (Sr.no.264) for the CDMA WLL phones manufactured by them? - the decision in the case of M/s. Surana Telecom Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa 2016 (12) TMI 1388 - CESTAT MUMBAI contested, where it was held that benefit of notification 6/2002-CE needs to be exten....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 821 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Super Cassettes Industries Ltd.

    Classification - worn out Silver targets - Whether to be classifiable under Chapter Subheading No. 7101.80 attracting 16 rate of duty as per Department or under Chapter Subheading No. 7101.31 which attracts NIL Rate of Duty - the decision in the case of Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Versus C.C.E., NOIDA 2016 (8) TMI 446 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD contested, where it was held that worn out Silver Targets are classifiable under chapter subheading No. 701....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 820 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner Versus Sri Kannapiran Mills Ltd.

    Valuation - Job worker - manufacture and clearance of intermediary goods to the principal manufacturer for manufacture of final goods - the decision in the case of M/s. Sri Kannapiran Mills Ltd. Versus CCE & ST, Salem 2016 (6) TMI 541 - CESTAT CHENNAI contested, where it was held that the Tribunal cannot make a new case to create jurisdiction for it to decide the issue not before it. Since the case is covered by Section 4 (3) (b) (i), the pre....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 819 - SUPREME COURT

    Avdel India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner

    Rivets - Demand - Limitation - Extended period - Suppression - the decision in the case of AVDEL (INDIA) PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MUMBAI 2004 (6) TMI 82 - CESTAT, MUMBAI contested - Held that - the civil appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution........ + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 818 - SUPREME COURT

    Union of India Versus Amalgamated Plantations (P) Ltd.

    Time limitation - Entitlement of Interest u/s 11BB of the Central Excise Act 1944 - the decision in the case of AMALGAMATED PLANTATIONS (P) LTD. Versus UNION OF INDIA 2013 (11) TMI 589 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT contested - Held that - The special leave petition is dismissed on the ground of limitation........ + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 817 - SUPREME COURT

    Eastern Metallizing Ltd. Versus Commissioner

    Imposition of penalty - Cenvat credit wrongly taken - M.S. Angle, M.S. Channel, G.C. Sheet and Welding Electrodes are used for making support structures for the capital goods - The decision in the case of M/s. Eastern Metallizing Ltd. Versus Commr. of Central Excise, Kolkata-II 2016 (5) TMI 897 - CESTAT KOLKATA contested, where it was held that when conflicting judgments with respect to an issue were available then it cannot be said that appellan....... + More


  • 2017 (8) TMI 788 - SUPREME COURT

    Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune Versus Mercedes Benz India Pvt Ltd

    Condonation of delay - Valuation - deduction of discount - the decision in the case of M/s Mercedes-Benz India Pvt. Ltd. Versus CCE, Pune-II 2016 (10) TMI 79 - CESTAT MUMBAI , contested - Held that - Delay in filing these appeals is condoned - appeals admitted........ + More


1........
 
 
 
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version