Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax SC VAT and Sales Tax - SC This

Law	-- All -- GST Income Tax Benami Property/ Transactions Customs Corporate Laws Securities / SEBI Insolvency & Bankruptcy FEMA PMLA Service Tax Central Excise CST, VAT & Sales Tax Wealth tax Indian Laws
Court	-- Any -- Supreme Court SC Orders / Highlights High Court Appellate Tribunal Tribunal Appellate authority for Advance Ruling Advance Ruling Authority ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY Commission Central Government Board DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court Commissioner / Appellate Authority Other
Citation	--Year-- 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 Upto 1949 - -Volume- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Landmark	Nil - N/A Referred in >= 3 Cases Referred in >= 4 Cases Referred in >= 5 Cases Referred in >= 10 Cases Referred in >= 15 Cases Referred in >= 25 Cases Referred in >= 50 Cases Referred in >= 100 Cases
Order by	TMI Citation Date of Decision

Advanced Search Options

VAT and Sales Tax - Supreme Court - Case Laws

Showing 1 to 20 of 1593 Records

More information of case laws are visible to the Subscriber of a package i.e:-
Party Name, Court Name, Date of Decision, Full Text of Headnote and Decision etc.

• 2022 (9) TMI 1000
  
  Adjustment of amount of tax paid on inter-state sale transaction, against the tax to be paid to the State of Jharkhand - HELD THAT:- The appellant - Tata Motors Limited was liable to pay central sales tax to the State of Jharkhand. However, treating the sale as stock transfer, the appellant/its representative had paid the tax on the aforesaid transaction to the State of Andhra Pradesh which is not leviable by the State of Andhra Pradesh. Therefore, the amount of central sales tax recovered by the State of Andhra Pradesh is required to be transferred to the State of Jharkhand and the same is required to be adjusted towards the amount of tax to be paid to the State of Jharkhand. In the present case the transaction is for the period prior to insertion of Section 22(1B) to the Act 1956 and the impugned order has been passed by the Appellate A....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (9) TMI 896
  
  Jurisdiction of HC to entertain the writ petition bypassing the statutory remedy of appeal - Validity of assessment order - belated notice of demand - AO called upon the assessee to produce relevant documents and also to show cause as to why it should not be assessed under the relevant provisions of Section 23 of the MVAT Act - HELD THAT:- It is required to be noted that against the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer under the provisions of the MVAT Act and CST Act, the assessee straightway preferred writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It is not in dispute that the statutes provide for the right of appeal against the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer and against the order passed by the first appellate authority, an appeal/revision before the Tribunal. In that view of the matter, the H....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (9) TMI 895
  
  Binding Judgement of Lager Bench / Majority decision - strength of the Bench - Levy of sales tax - Classification of goods - Pan Masala, which contains tobacco and gutka - covered by an Entry in the First Schedule to the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act 1957, or not - taxability by the State under the Delhi Sales Tax Act 1975 and/or the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act 1948 and/or the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959? As per INDIRA BANERJEE J. HELD THAT:- It is well settled that once goods are chargeable under the ADE Act, the State cannot levy sales tax on the same goods under a State enactment. In KOTHARI PRODUCTS LTD. VERSUS GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [2000 (1) TMI 823 - SUPREME COURT], the question was, ‘tobacco’ being specified in the First Schedule to the ADE Act, and exempted from Sales T....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (9) TMI 849
  
  Initiation of Recovery proceedings - transfer of goods, plant, and machinery (immoveable property) - bonafide purchaser - Section 34 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act - HELD THAT:- Section 34 of the Act shall be applicable only in a case where there is a transfer of immovable property belonging to the original assesee, during the pendency of any proceedings under the Act with the intention of defrauding any such tax or other dues. As per proviso to Section 34, nothing in Section 34 shall impair the rights of a transferee in good faith and for consideration. Thus, the power of Section 34 can be exercised only in a case where the transfer of immoveable property belonging to the original assessee is made during the pendency of any proceedings under the Act and such transfer is found to be with the intention to defraud any such tax and other dues. In....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (9) TMI 317
  
  Recovery of dues - priority of settlement of dues - Government can claim first charge over the property of the Corporate Debtor or not - whether Section 48 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax, 2003 can prevail over Section 53 of the IBC or not - HELD THAT:- Section 31 of the IBC which provides for approval of a Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority makes it clear that the Adjudicating Authority can approve the Resolution Plan only upon satisfaction that the Resolution Plan, as approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC), meets the requirements of Section 30(2) of the IBC. When the Resolution Plan does not meet the requirements of Section 30(2), the same cannot be approved. There can be no question of acceptance of a Resolution Plan that is not in conformity with the statutory provisions of Section 31(2) of the IBC. Section 30(2) (b) o....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (7) TMI 1174
  
  Separate powers of the Central and the State - repugnancy owing to the application of the State laws to the vehicle permit issued under the law made by Parliament - Constitutional validity of sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 4, Section 15 of the 1976 Act and Section 8A of the Kerala Motor Transport Workers’ Welfare Fund Act, 1985 - thrust of the challenge is on the ground that the State Legislature by way of stated amendments to the welfare legislation has effectively bootstrapped the obligation to make contribution to the workers’ welfare fund with the obligation to pay tax for operating motor vehicles - encroaching and overriding the relevant provisions of the Central legislation i.e., the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to paralyse the Stage and Goods Carriage Operation or to undermine the effectiveness of the transport permit....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (7) TMI 519
  
  Classification of goods - KADIPROL - can be categorized as Poultry Feed falling under Entry 25 of Schedule I of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act or as a Drug and Medicine under Entry 26(1) of Schedule II Part A of the GST Act? - product in question was sold in a sachet/packet of 100 gm - HELD THAT:- It was not meant to be given as a food to the poultry. It was required to be mixed with the feed given to the poultry/birds. It cannot be directly fed and/or given to the birds. Therefore, there is some merit in the contention of the Revenue that the impugned judgment and order does not deal with the reasoning given by the Tribunal. It merely quotes and relies upon the two decisions in the case of Glaxo Laboratories (India) Ltd. [1978 (12) TMI 164 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] and M/s. Pfizer (India) Ltd. [1991 (3) TMI 343 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] without a det....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (7) TMI 454
  
  Extension of time limit for completion of assessment - Power of the Commissioner to allow further time of six months to the Assessing Authority to complete the audit assessment must be exercised before the Assessing Authorities time to conclude the proceedings expire - Assessing Authority could pass the assessment order after the period of six months in expectation of the Commissioner extending the time or not - grant of post-facto extension, ratifying the assessment order passed beyond the period of six months - HELD THAT:- Even where a statute uses varied expression such as ‘deferment’ or ‘extension’, the purpose is only to grant further time to the Assessing Authority to complete the assessment. Therefore, there is no purpose in drawing a distinction in the power of extension by referring to the specific express....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (6) TMI 203
  
  Adverse remarks against the officer of VAT department acting as AO - Order of the High Court - Validity of provisional assessment order - ex-parte order - proper service of notice or not - HELD THAT:- In the impugned order dated 29.02.2016 relating to the merits of the case are concerned, no comments are required in that relation, for the same having not been challenged by the State. However, even when all the findings of the High Court in the principal part of order dated 29.02.2016 are accepted, they would only lead to the result that the impugned actions in drawing up ex parte assessment orders and then seeking to enforce recovery as also the impugned action in rejecting the application for registration of change of place of business did not meet with the approval of the High Court. Such disapproval of the High Court had been essential....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (4) TMI 558
  
  Withdrawal of benefit of tax exemption - works contract - benefit granted in the process of revival of the industry - whether the benefit granted under Sick Industrial Companies Act, 1985, can be withdrawn by the subsequent Government Order? - principle of promissory estoppel. As per Hrishikesh Roy, J. HELD THAT:- Even though the 2004 Government Order, and the BIFR Sanctioned Scheme of 2005 were enacted in furtherance of 1994 Government Order, both these documents do not specify the time line for tax exemptions prescribed in the 1994 government order. Recently this Court in the case of STATE OF GUJARAT VERSUS ARCELOR MITTAL NIPPON STEEL INDIA LIMITED [2022 (1) TMI 1013 - SUPREME COURT] has held that exemption provisions and notifications are to be strictly interpreted in accordance with legislative intent without any addition or subtracti....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (3) TMI 1055
  
  Restoration of penalty - at the time of interception, the e-sugam was not tendered and was furnished subsequently - Section 64(1) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 - HELD THAT:- The SLP is dismissed.

  ---

• 2022 (3) TMI 270
  
  Levy of Excise Duty - weak spirit, which was more than 2% allowable wastage - industrial alcohol not fit for human consumption - loss arising during the process of re-distillation in the State of Orissa - HELD THAT:- It is not in dispute that the license, which was granted to the respondent-Company, is for the purpose of manufacturing, bottling, blending and reduction of IMFL. It is also not in dispute that as required under the license, the respondent-Company has installed one ENA column to rectify the rectified spirit to be used in the manufacturing of IMFL. It is also not in dispute that the sample of wastage generated in the manufacturing process was sent for examination to the State Drugs Testing and Research Laboratory, Orissa - It is thus clear that the wastage generated has been found to be unfit and unsafe for potable purpose. Th....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (3) TMI 226
  
  Maintainability of petition - Input tax credit - juristic person - HELD THAT:- The writ petition preferred by Tata Steel Ltd., which is a juristic person, could not have been dismissed as not maintainable when it had challenged the denial of input tax credit to the unit at Naomundi, in respect of the purchases made and utilised in the said unit. Interpretation of statue - Clause (ix) to sub-section (8) of Section 18 of the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 - HELD THAT:- The period involved in the present appeal are the financial years 2006-07 and 2007-08. These aspects have to be considered. Learned senior counsel for the appellant has stated that the appellant may consider challenging these amendments and notification, if required and necessary. The impugned order interpreting Clause (ix) to sub-section (8) of Section 18 of the Jharkha....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (2) TMI 1111
  
  Interpretation of statute - Entry 44 of Part B of the Fourth Schedule to the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 - Cotton Hank Yarn - Division Bench was of the view that no external aid for interpretation was called for when the language of the Entry in question was clear in itself - HELD THAT:- When the Entry in question specifically provides for exemption to the goods described as “Hank Yarn” without any ambiguity or qualification, its import cannot be restricted by describing it as being available only for the hank form of one raw material like cotton nor could it be restricted with reference to its user industry. That being the position, reference to the decision in K.P. Varghese (supraKP VARGHESE VERSUS INCOME-TAX OFFICER, ERNAKULAM, AND ANOTHER [1981 (9) TMI 1 - SUPREME COURT] remains entirely inapposite to the facts of....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (2) TMI 1006
  
  Liability to pay tax under the U.P. Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1997 - liability on the financier-in-possession of the transport vehicle or not - financier had extended a loan for the purchase of the transport vehicle and on default in payment of the loan is in possession of the vehicle in question - whether, a financier of a motor vehicle/transport vehicle in respect of which a hire-purchase, lease or hypothecation agreement has been entered, is liable to tax from the date of taking possession of the said vehicle under the said agreements? - HELD THAT:- In respect of a transport vehicle, the tax is to be paid in advance as monthly tax or yearly tax, as the case may be, and only thereafter such vehicle shall be put to use - therefore, before any transport vehicle is put to use or used, the owner is liable to pay the tax in advance and on....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (1) TMI 1013
  
  Exemption from payment of amount of purchase tax - Applicability of original Entry No.255(2) vide F.D.’s Notification dated 05.03.1992, which was issued under Section 49(2) of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act, 1969 - subsequent amended Entry No.255(2) issued vide Notifications dated 14.11.2000 and 16.01.2002 in any way alters or amends the basic requirements/conditions stipulated as per the first notification dated 05.03.1992 - subsequent amended Entry vide Government Notifications dated 14.11.2000 and 16.01.2002 in any way takes away the right of the respondent to avail the exemption under the first/parent Entry No.255(2) issued vide Notification dated 05.03.1992 or not - breach of the declaration filed by the respondent as per Form No.26 - demand of the purchase tax on and after 14.11.2000 was hit by the principle of promissory estoppel ....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (1) TMI 312
  
  Levy of excise duty on the liquor destroyed in fire - Demand raised against the writ petitioner company (respondent herein) towards loss of excise revenue because of destruction of liquor in fire - fire incident that took place in a godown of the distillery of the respondent company - whether demand of excise duty on the liquor lost in fire is authorised by law and has rightly been raised as per the applicable provisions of the Act of 1910, the Excise Manual and the Rules of 1969? - HELD THAT:- A comprehensive look at the relevant provisions of law makes it clear that so far as IMFL is concerned, no provision is made in the Excise Manual for any wastage allowance in relation to the bottled sprit, but, in terms of Rule 7(11) of the Rules of 1969, an allowance up to 1% on the total quantity of spirit stored during a month may be allowed for....... + More

  ---

• 2022 (1) TMI 128
  
  Validity of fresh assessment orders - HC quashed the assessment order - Instead of preferring an appeal/appeals before the First Appellate Authority against the fresh assessment orders, the dealers straight way filed writ petitions before the High Court and by impugned judgment and orders, the High Court has allowed the said writ petitions and quashed the fresh assessment orders, solely on the ground that pending suo moto revisional proceedings, the Assessing Officer ought not to have proceeded further with the fresh assessment. - HELD THAT:- Nothing has been observed by the High Court on the merits of the fresh assessment orders. If the fresh assessment orders would have gone against the State, in that case the State would have been the aggrieved party and the State could have raised the objection that pending suo moto revisional proceed....... + More

  ---

• 2021 (12) TMI 670
  
  Suit for recovery - mortgage transactions - defence of the respondent was that there was no relationship of mortgagor and mortgagee between the parties but that the relationship was as landlord and tenant - whether the alleged bills forming the claim in the suits have been raised on the basis of the fictitious and fraudulent transactions? - HELD THAT:- The respondents have admitted that no sales tax is payable by a dealer to a dealer. By necessary implication, the respondents are admitting the appellant to be a dealer as also the respondents to be dealer under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975. It is only on account of sales made by a dealer to a dealer that the sales tax is not be payable as the incidence of payment of tax would be when the goods are sold to a consumer. The respondents as wholesaler, were getting the benefit of trade discoun....... + More

  ---

• 2021 (12) TMI 477
  
  Maintainability of appeal - whether the amount deposited under protest prior to an order of assessment can be adjusted against the mandatory pre-deposit required for filing an appeal? - Section 26(6A) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act 2002 - HELD THAT:- Under the provisions of Section 26(6A), the aggregate of the amounts stipulated in the sub-clauses of the provision has to be deposited and proof of payment is required to be produced together with the filing of the appeal. Both clauses (b) and (c) employ the expression “an amount equal to ten per cent of the amount of tax disputed by the appellant”. The entirety of the undisputed amount has to be deposited and 10 per cent of the disputed amount of tax is required to be deposited by the appellant. In the present case, the appellant disputes the entirety of the tax demand. ....... + More

  ---

12345........ 80