Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 2004 (9) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (9) TMI 386 - SC - Companies LawWhether a single incident in this case would be sufficient to detain the appellant? Held that:- Appeal dismissed. The detenue who did not send any representation immediately on receipt of the detention order and the material accompanying therein deliberately tried to mislead the authorities by filing an undated and unsigned representation simultaneously to the State Government, the Union Government and the detaining authority which was sent to the Advisory Board knowing very well that this was likely to cause some delay, thus he has tried to mislead the authorities by the above act of his. Thus in agreement with the stand taken by the respondent-State that undated and unsigned representation cannot be treated as a representation within the meaning of Article 22(5) of the Constitution requiring immediate attention of the authorities concerned.
|