Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (4) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (4) TMI 366 - CESTAT, BANGALOREExtract: .......ese items cannot be treated as marketable goods. The appellant’s case is identical to the case of Tungabhadra Steel. Therefore, the ratio of that decision would apply to their case. Their activity is not excisable. 7. In the view we have taken above, the appeal succeeds and is allowed with consequential relief, if any, to the appellants.
|