Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2004 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (3) TMI 558 - CESTAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......quo Further, we also observe that in Tarai Foods case (supra), the provisions of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, were not taken into consideration which mandate the manufacturer to mention his name and address on the food packages. We, therefore, find no infirmity in the impugned order and accordingly reject the appeal, filed by the Revenue.
|