Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2010 (6) TMI 327 - HC - Companies Law
Issues: Claim for payment due in business transaction
Analysis: The petitioner, a company, claimed that the respondent owed them a sum of Rs. 5,94,813.65 as on a specific date, which was later confirmed by the respondent, leading to a balance of Rs. 5,28,024.49. The petitioner alleged that the respondent had placed an order for design and models, requiring an investment of Rs. 5,20,000 for dies. The respondent, however, denied the claim, insisting on compliance with the terms of the business transaction. Subsequent notices and replies acknowledged varying amounts due, but the respondent contended that defective supplies needed rectification before payment. The court noted the absence of material evidence regarding invoices or contracts for the supply of materials, making it challenging to determine the exact amount due. Consequently, the court rejected the petition, emphasizing the lack of clarity in the claimed sum owed by the respondent to the petitioner.
|