Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2005 (10) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (10) TMI 330 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......fore, we uphold the duty demand. Penalty is also warranted for the reason that they knowingly misdeclared their products for the purposes of availing of benefit of concessional rate of duty, which was not otherwise available to them. Therefore, the penalty is also sustained. 3. emsp In the result, we uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal.
|