Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2006 (4) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2006 (4) TMI 363 - CESTAT, BANGALOREExtract: ....... the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find any reason for imposing penalty under Rule 25 as, the dispute arises on account of interpretation of the term lsquo brand name rsquo . As the appellants acted under bona fide belief, we set aside the penalty. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms. (Pronounced in open Court on 6-4-2006)
|