Forgot password
New User/ Regiser
⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2003 (1) TMI 93 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT
"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the interest claimed as revenue expenditure amounting to Rs. 14,09,942 cannot be treated as capital expenditure and added to work-in-progress in spite of the fact that other expenses on project were being capitalised by the assessee itself and holding that the Commissioner of Income-tax was wrong in directing the Assessing Officer to disallow the said interest and treat the same as capital expenditure as a part of work-in-progress, thereby quashing the order under section 263 of the Act of the Commissioner of Income-tax?" - we answer the above question in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the Department.