Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2009 (5) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2009 (5) TMI 769 - CESTAT, CHENNAIExtract: .......wledge of the department. We therefore hold that penalty on the respondents is not warranted, uphold the impugned order and reject the appeal. 3. emsp The prayer in the cross-objection is for rejection of the Revenue rsquo s appeal for retaining penalty and therefore, the cross-objection is allowed. (Order dictated and pronounced in the open Court)
|