Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2006 (12) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2006 (12) TMI 97 - HC - Income Tax

Issues involved: The judgment involves the following issues: 1. Disallowance of share loss for assessment years 1991-92, 1993-94, and 1994-95. 2. Disallowance of interest on loan for assessment years 1992-93, 1993-94, and 1995-96. 3. Whether the investment in a flat was made utilizing funds from the sale of shares and loans.

Disallowance of Share Loss: The assessee, an investment company, claimed losses in share transactions for the mentioned assessment years. The Assessing Officer disallowed the losses, stating that the transactions were not supported by physical delivery of shares and were done through transfer entry. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) reversed this decision after examining documents and contract notes, finding the transactions genuine and duly supported. The Tribunal affirmed this decision, emphasizing that trading results cannot be disturbed based on probabilities.

Disallowance of Interest on Loan: The Assessing Officer disallowed the interest paid on a loan for the purchase of a flat, claiming the funds were used for non-business assets. However, the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found the investment in the flat legitimate and allowed the interest claim, stating that borrowings for share investments entitle the assessee to claim interest. The Tribunal upheld this decision, emphasizing proper appreciation of facts.

Investment in Flat: The Tribunal approved the findings of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) regarding the investment in a flat, stating that tax planning to reduce tax burden is not an offense if not violative of tax laws. The Tribunal found no evidence of fraudulent intent by the assessee and upheld the decisions based on evidence and legal precedents cited. The appeal was dismissed, with no interference in the impugned order based on the facts and evidence presented.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates