Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 2000 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2000 (8) TMI 55 - HC - Income Tax

Issues involved:
1. Entitlement to claim deduction u/s 80HHC on receipt of labour commission.
2. Taxation of export reserves withdrawn from business and transferred to partners' capital account.

Entitlement to claim deduction u/s 80HHC on receipt of labour commission:
The court held that labour commission/indenting commission was not includible in business profits for the purpose of claiming deduction u/s 80HHC. Citing a previous judgment, it was established that the issue was answered in favor of the Department and against the assessee.

Taxation of export reserves withdrawn from business and transferred to partners' capital account:
The assessee had created export reserves in previous assessment years, which were later transferred to the partners' capital account. The Assessing Officer taxed this amount as income for the relevant assessment year. The first appellate authority allowed the appeal, stating that there was no violation of the proviso to section 80HHC as the reserves were utilized for business purposes. However, the Tribunal dismissed the appeal, noting that the section had undergone changes and there was no provision for taxing the withdrawn reserves. The court agreed with the Tribunal, emphasizing that the section did not mandate a statutory reserve to be maintained permanently. The absence of specific provisions led to the conclusion that the transfer to the partners' capital account did not constitute a breach. The court highlighted the difference in treatment between section 80HHC and section 80HHD, where consequences of non-utilization of reserves were clearly defined. Ultimately, the court found no merit in the Department's argument and partly allowed the appeal, with no order as to costs.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates