Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 2010 (2) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (2) TMI 1042 - SC - Indian LawsCompassionate appointment Whether respondent really wanted the appointment? Whether he possessed the eligibility? Whether any post was available? Held that:- The High Court was not justified in quashing the communication dated 31.1.2006 or in directing reconsideration of the case of the respondent for compassionate appointment. Allow this appeal in part as the orders of the learned Single Judge and Division Bench are set aside.The respondent and/or his family may file a fresh application under the new scheme, as directed by the Bank in its letter dated 31.1.2006.The appellant Bank is directed to process such application under the new scheme, if and when made, and pay the lump sum ex gratia amount due in terms of that scheme, to the beneficiaries, within four months of the receipt of the application.
|