Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 2006 (5) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2006 (5) TMI 443 - SC - Indian LawsWhether the appointment of the respondent being ad hoc in nature and furthermore on a contract basis as envisaged under Section 2(oo)(bb) of the Industrial Disputes Act, her services were liable to be terminated in terms thereof? Held that:- There cannot be any dispute that provisions of Section 6-N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act have not been complied with. We are, however, of the opinion that instead and in place of issuing a direction for reinstatement of service, interests of justice shall be sub-served if compensation of Rs.30,000/- per person is directed to be paid. It goes without saying that the Respondents would be entitled to wages and other remunerations in terms of the interim order passed by the High Court so long they have actually worked. We, furthermore, hope and trust that in all future appointments, the Appellant shall strictly follow the provisions of the Adhiniyam and the Rules. Thus the impugned order modified by directing that the respondent shall be compensated by payment of a sum of Rs.25,000/- instead of the order for reinstatement with back wages.
|