Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 2007 (4) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2007 (4) TMI 621 - SC - Companies LawWhether a person is incharge of and responsible for the conduct of the business of the Company, is to be adjudged during the trial on the basis of the materials to be placed on record by the parties? Held that:- High Court has rightly come to the conclusion that it is not a fit case for exercise of jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the complaint. In fact, an advertence to Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act shows that on the other elements of an offence under Section 138 being satisfied, the burden is on the Board of Directors or the Officers incharge of the affairs of the company to show that they are not liable to be convicted. Any restriction on their power or existence of any special circumstance that makes them not liable is something that is peculiarly within their knowledge and it is for them to establish at the trial such a restriction or to show that at the relevant time they were not incharge of the affairs of the company. Reading the complaint as a whole, we are satisfied that it is a case where the contentions sought to be raised by the appellant can only be dealt with after the conclusion of the trial. Appeal dismissed.
|