Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2012 (3) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2012 (3) TMI 523 - AT - Income Tax

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of additions made u/s 68 of the IT Act.
2. Validity of reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer.

Summary:

Issue 1: Deletion of Additions Made u/s 68 of the IT Act

The revenue contested the deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer (A.O) u/s 68 of the IT Act for Assessment Years 2002-03, 2003-04, and 2004-05. The CIT (A) had deleted the additions on the grounds that the share application money received by the assessee from its associate concern was genuine and duly reflected in the balance sheets of both parties. The CIT (A) found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence, including confirmation letters, bank statements, and income tax returns, to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, noting that no additional evidence was considered and that the A.O had not pointed out any discrepancies in the provided documents. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeals, affirming that the amounts could not be treated as unexplained cash credits u/s 68.

Issue 2: Validity of Reassessment Proceedings

The assessee challenged the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated by the A.O based on an audit objection. The CIT (A) upheld the reassessment proceedings, but the Tribunal found that the reassessment was based on the incorrect application of Section 2 (22)(e) of the IT Act. The Tribunal noted that the assessee was not a registered shareholder of the payer company, and thus, Section 2 (22)(e) was not applicable, referencing the Special Bench decision in ACIT vs. Bhaumik Colours Pvt. Ltd. and the Delhi High Court decision in CIT vs. Ankitech (P) Ltd. The Tribunal concluded that the income could not be said to have escaped assessment on this basis, and thus, the reassessment proceedings were invalid. As a result, the Cross Objections filed by the assessee became infructuous and were dismissed.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal dismissed both the departmental appeals and the Cross Objections, affirming the CIT (A)'s deletion of additions u/s 68 and invalidating the reassessment proceedings.

The order was pronounced in the open court on 07.03.2012.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates