Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 1966 (3) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1966 (3) TMI 85 - SUPREME COURTExtract: .......pondent was ill-advised in prosecuting the petition even after he had been appointed an officiating Tahsildar. The appeal is allowed and the order passed by the High Court set aside. The petition filed by the respondent must be dismissed. In the circumstances of the case, we direct that there will be no order as to costs throughout. Appeal allowed.
|