Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2014 (9) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (9) TMI 1064 - HC - Companies LawFurnishing of documents - Held that:- No prejudice would be caused to Respondent No.2 if these documents are supplied. On the contrary, if these documents are supplied in time there wont be further delay in concluding the proceedings after giving a reasonable opportunity to the Petitioner. We must note here that the Petitioner has not pressed prayer clause (a) and (b)(i). Petitioner has given a list of documents which, according to them, have not been disclosed to them and the said list of documents is annexed at Exhibit-A to the affidavit of the Petitioner which is at running page 853. Mr. De Vitre, the learned Senior Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 to 4, after referring to the said list at Exhibit-A, has submitted that documents at Serial No.2, 3 & 6 would be supplied and the document at Serial No.5 has already been supplied. He submitted that documents at Serial No.7 are available with the Petitioner. He further submitted that documents at Serial Nos 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the said list are based on facts. 23. We are, therefore, of the view that Respondent No.2 shall furnish to the Petitioner the documents at Serial Nos. 2, 3, & 6 which are mentioned in Exhibit-A referred to above within two weeks from today. Further proceedings to be commenced upon documents being supplied within two weeks thereafter. Thereafter, additional explanation may be furnished by the Petitioner.
|