9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Validity of orders of the Collector directing handover of land to rightful owners under the East Punjab Utilization of Lands Act, 1949. 2. Maintainability of Civil Appeals under Article 136 of the Constitution. 3. Power of the Collector to deprive petitioners of their fundamental rights. 4. Lack of evidence of leases before the Collector. 5. Ownership of disputed lands by Gram Sabhas or panchayats. 6. Challenge to the Collector's power to proceed under the Act. 7. Questions to be determined by the Collector before passing further orders. Analysis: 1. The judgment addresses a batch of Civil Appeals and Writ Petitions concerning the orders of the Collector directing the handover of land under the East Punjab Utilization of Lands Act, 1949. The Court notes common questions of fact and law in these cases, allowing for a single judgment to dispose of them collectively. 2. The issue of the maintainability of the Civil Appeals under Article 136 of the Constitution is raised. The Court dismisses the preliminary objection, stating that the technical objection is overruled, allowing the appeals to proceed. 3. The judgment delves into the power of the Collector to deprive petitioners of their alleged fundamental rights to hold land. The Court notes the lack of concrete evidence to support the Collector's orders, emphasizing the need for proper investigation before making such determinations. 4. Notably, the absence of leases presented before the Collector distinguishes the present cases from previous judgments. The Court highlights the denial by appellants and petitioners of receiving land under the Act, raising doubts about the ownership claims of the alleged private owners. 5. The judgment also touches upon the ownership of disputed lands, suggesting that a significant portion may vest in Gram Sabhas or panchayats. This raises questions about the legitimacy of orders directing possession to assumed private owners. 6. A crucial aspect of the judgment involves the challenge to the Collector's power to proceed under the Act. The Court emphasizes the need for a thorough examination of the source and extent of the Collector's jurisdiction before passing further orders, given conflicting assertions and pieces of evidence. 7. Lastly, the Court outlines specific questions for the Collector to consider before making any decisions, including the validity of leases, compensation proceedings, legal status of alleged lessees, claims by Gaon Panchayats, and the appropriateness of further legal proceedings between parties. In conclusion, the Court allows the appeals and Writ Petitions, quashing the orders of the Collector and halting further proceedings under the Act until the status of the lands in possession is clarified. The judgment emphasizes the need for a comprehensive investigation and proper determination of legal rights before any further action is taken, with each party bearing their own costs in the proceedings.
|
