Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 1996 (7) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1996 (7) TMI 582 - MADRAS HIGH COURTExtract: ....... the second respondent can be accepted. More over the second respondent has stated in his counter affidavit that he had instructed his authorities to restore possession to the petitioner. Taking into consideration of this aspect also, I find that the respondents have not committed any wilful contempt of court. The petition is accordingly dismissed.
|