2010 (7) TMI 704 - HC - Income Tax

Reopening - Validity of notice - That section 149 of the Act speaks of time limit for issue of notice and categorically prescribes that no notice under section 148 shall be issued after the prescribed limitation has lapsed - It is submitted that in the facts of the present case it is apparent that the notices have been dispatched by registered post only on April 7 2010 hence the same have clearly been issued beyond the prescribed period of limitation and as such are time barred - In the present case the relevant assessment year in each of the petitions is 2003-04 ; the impugned notices are dated March 31 2010 ; and the said notices were sent for booking to the Speed Post Centre Ahmedabad on April 7 2010 - apex court in the case of GKN Drive- shafts (India) Ltd. 2002 -TMI - 6100 - SUPREME Court wherein it was held that the impugned notices under section 148 in relation to the assessment year 2003-04 having been issued on April 7 2010 which is clearly beyond the period of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year are clearly barred by limitation and as such cannot be sustained - Decided in favor of the assessee

Issues Involved:
1. Validity of the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
2. Determination of the correct date of issue of the notice.
3. Applicability of the time limit prescribed under section 149 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
4. Requirement to follow the procedure laid down in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Validity of the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
The petitioners challenged the legality and validity of the notices dated March 31, 2010, issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for reopening the assessment for the assessment year 2003-04. The core contention was that these notices were time-barred as they were issued beyond the prescribed time limit under section 149 of the Act.

2. Determination of the correct date of issue of the notice:
The petitioners received the notices on April 8, 2010, and upon inquiry, it was confirmed by the Speed Post Booking Centre, Ahmedabad, that the notices were booked on April 7, 2010. The Revenue contended that the notices were signed and dated March 31, 2010, and thus were valid. However, the court found that merely signing the notices on March 31, 2010, did not equate to issuance. The court determined that the date of issue would be the date the notices were handed over for service to the proper officer, which was April 7, 2010.

3. Applicability of the time limit prescribed under section 149 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
Section 149 stipulates that no notice under section 148 shall be issued after the prescribed limitation period, which is six years from the end of the relevant assessment year. In this case, the relevant assessment year was 2003-04, and the notices were issued on April 7, 2010, which was beyond the six-year limit, rendering the notices time-barred.

4. Requirement to follow the procedure laid down in the case of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO:
The Revenue argued that the petitioners should have filed objections against the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment as per the Supreme Court's decision in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO. However, the court held that in light of the facts, no useful purpose would have been served by asking the petitioners to undertake this exercise, as the notices were already found to be time-barred.

Conclusion:
The court concluded that the notices under section 148 issued on April 7, 2010, were beyond the six-year limitation period prescribed under section 149 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and thus were invalid. Consequently, the petitions were allowed, and the impugned notices dated March 31, 2010, were quashed and set aside. The rule was made absolute with no order as to costs.

← Previous Next →