Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com   
Home Case Index 2012 (11) TMI Income Tax Tri Income Tax + Tri
← Previous Next →
  • Login

User Login
Username  
Password  
Stay sign in     

New User / Regiser    -    Forget password



Shri Subhrajee Mallick, Prop. M/s. BPL. Distributors Versus Income-tax Officer, Ward-2, Paradeep. - 2012 (11) TMI 137 - ITAT CUTTACK


Extract:-
Retail trade u/s 44AF - Income below the rate of 5 as prescribed u/s 44AF - Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance and u/s.271(1)(c) holding a view the addition was the result of submission of inaccurate particulars of income in violation to the provisions of Section 44AF - Held that - CIT(A) can do what the ITO can do and also direct him to do what he has failed to do, as held in Jute Corpn. of India Ltd. v. CIT 1990 (9) TMI 6 - SUPREME COURT - Since the assessee maintained books of account duly audited u/s.44AB, there is no scope for application of the provisions of Section 44AF, as rightly contended by the learned Counsel for the assessee. The benchmark of 5 therefore was not the basis for the assessee who filed returns according to the audit report u/s.44AB. Therefore, the initiation of proceedings u/s.147 having been initiated by the Assessing Officer for the reason the assessee having violated the provisions of Section 44AF was not at all correct in view of the audit report furnished by the assessee, in our considered view the assessment orders and also the consequential penalty orders for both the AYs under consideration cannot be sustained.


 

← Previous Next →

 


what is new what is new

Latest

Featured

Experts

Subscription

More Options

Communication


|| About us || Contact us || Feed Back || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map || || ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Website