Case Laws
Acts
Notifications
Circulars
Classification
Forms
Manuals
Articles
News
D. Forum
Highlights
Notes
🚨 Important Update for Our Users
We are transitioning to our new and improved portal - www.taxtmi.com - for a better experience.
⚠️ This portal will be discontinued on 31-07-2025
If you encounter any issues or problems while using the new portal,
please
let us know via our feedback form
so we can address them promptly.
Home
2012 (11) TMI 744 - AT - Income TaxInterest on FDR from Reserve Fund - AO found that assessee claimed exemption of interest of Rs.38, 69, 627/- received on the funds deposited with the bank for the purpose of pension gratuity and other retirement benefits of the employees Held that - Fund was not a superannuation fund - assessee did not press his claim u/ss 10(25) and 36(1)(xii) of the IT Act before the Tribunal as was the claim made before the authorities below therefore the claim of the assessee could not be considered under those provisions - assessee received interest on the funds deposited with the bank in this regard. Since the reserve funds remained with the assessee therefore interest earned on such funds shall be income of the assessee Against assessee Contribution made for meeting the future liability on account of pension gratuity etc. Held that - Assessee is admittedly maintaining cash system of accounting Held that - Authorities below has however not considered the rule referred to by ld. Counsel for assessee in his arguments and have also not given any finding if the assessee spent any actual amount on this hand under the year appeal because on provision basis this year the assessee might have made claim in earlier year for which the amount could have been spent by the assessee - issue requires reconsideration at the level of the AO matter remanded to AO Disallowance on statutory payments paid under the Mandi Act - assessee claimed the above amount as deduction in the income and expenditure account in the form of board fees alleged that it was a transfer of fund to the mother concern Held that - Assessee paid the election amount as per the requirements of the Act as noted above as well as per the directions of the Board therefore it was a statutory payment made by the assessee for the purpose of running of the activity of the assessee - assessee has debited Rs.10 lacs under the head election expenses which is also mentioned in the income and expenditure account. Therefore the authorities below were not justified in disallowing the aforesaid expenditure which his paid by the assessee out of the market committee funds. Since the amount is incurred for the purpose of running the activity of the assessee therefore it was allowable deduction - Assessing Officer directed to allow the deduction
|