Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2013 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (3) TMI 435 - AT - Income TaxRegistration u/s 12AA rejected - Commissioner observed that activities of the Society do not qualify in the nature of charity within the meaning of Section 2(15) - Held that:- At the stage of application for registration, what is required is the authorities can pursue the objects of the society as well as verify the genuineness of the activities.From the Memorandum of Association of the Society, it becomes clear that the society is mainly floated for the purpose of education and also to provide scholarships to the students and to do other general charitable works like establishing and maintenance of parks, gardens, gymnasiums, sports clubs, Dharamshalas and rest houses and rest houses for the use of public in general. Thus it is clear that the society is mainly registered for the charitable purposes. The observation of Commissioner that mere provisions of education is not charitable, is not correct in view of the decision of High Court in case of Pinegrove International Charitable Trust V. Union of India [2010 (1) TMI 49 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ]. Further it has been observed by the Court that at the stage of registration only genuineness of the activities of the society, are required to be gone through. Thus as Commissioner has nowhere doubted the genuineness of the activities. Merely because the assessee society has taken over the furniture and fixtures of existing school, would not to alter the situation. It is wrongly observed that particulars regarding lease of land were not furnished when the lease deed itself was filed before him. He has further wrongly observed that lease rent was only Rs. 15,000 pa whereas same is shown at Rs. 15,000 pm for the first 10 years then Rs. 22,500 for the next 10 years and Rs. 30,000 for the llast 10 years. The contention of the revenue that after the lapse of lease period of 30 years, the building etc. would revert black to the lessor who is closely related to the General Secretary of the Society, would not make difference as at best, it can be construed a benefit which can be construed to have been passed on to a relation etc. in violation of various conditions in S 13(1)(d) of the Act. But this part cannot be examined at the time of granting registration and can be examined only while giving exemption u/s 11. Therefore, registration has been wrongly denied to the assessee - in favour of assessee.
|