Home Case Index All Cases Wealth-tax Wealth-tax + HC Wealth-tax - 1990 (11) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1990 (11) TMI 41 - DELHI HIGH COURTExtract: .......spondent was the executor of the will but it seems to ignore the fact that, as held by the Tribunal, he is also the beneficiary under the will and he has himself occupied the premises for 12 months. He was, therefore, entitled to the benefit of section 7(4). The answer to the question proposed is self-evident and, therefore, need not be called for.
|