Tax Management India .com TMI - Tax Management India. Com   
  Feedback
Home Case Index 2013 (8) TMI Central Excise HC Central Excise + HC
← Previous Next →
  • Main Text
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In

User Login
Username  
Password  
Stay sign in     

Forget password        New User / Regiser

TMI Database

This portal is 11 Years 5 Months and 19 Days old.

Our strength is our Subscribers. We are proud of them.

 


The Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai Versus M/s. Electro Steel Castings Ltd & CESTAT, CHENNAI


Extract:-
Period of limitation of refund claim under section 11B of the Central Excise Act Held that - Relying upon the decision in the case of Dena Snuff (P) Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh 2003 (9) TMI 84 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , it has been held that period of limitation of one year prescribed under Sub Section (1) will not apply in case duties are paid under protest. - Hon ble Supreme Court held that the relevant date from which the period of limitation starts to run is from the date on which the assessee s own case finally decided by the Tribunal - Issue relating to period of li ....... - .......

 



 


 

← Previous Next →

 


what is new what is new

Latest Updates

Featured

Subscription

Experts

More Options

Communication


Follow us:            

|| About us || Contact us || Feed Back || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map || || ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Website