Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise HC Central Excise + HC
← Previous Next →
  • Contents
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In

 

User Login
Username  
Password  
Stay sign in     

Forget password        New User/ Regiser

 

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai Versus M/s. Electro Steel Castings Ltd & CESTAT, CHENNAI

Period of limitation of refund claim under section 11B of the Central Excise Act Held that - Relying upon the decision in the case of Dena Snuff (P) Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Chandigarh 2003 (9) TMI 84 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , it has been held that period of limitation of one year prescribed under Sub Section (1) will not apply in case duties are paid under protest. - Hon ble Supreme Court held that the relevant date from which the period of limitation starts to run is from the da....... + More

 

 

← Previous Next →

 

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai Versus M/s. Electro Steel Castings Ltd & CESTAT, CHENNAI

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version