Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + AT Companies Law - 2013 (11) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (11) TMI 1425 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAIPenalty imposed for offence u/s 15HA - Investigation report not submitted to appellants - whether, it was mandatory for the respondent to furnish entire copy of the investigation report to the appellants - whether failure to furnish entire copy of the investigation report constitutes violation of principles of natural justice - Held that:- It is equally well established that non supply of copy of documents having no bearing on charges framed in the show cause notice or non supply of documents tendered during inquiry but not relied upon by Inquiry Officer in support of charges, does not amount to violation of principles of natural justice - although appellants have repeatedly demanded complete copy of the investigation report, they have not demonstrated as to how failure to furnish complete copy of the investigation report has caused prejudice to them. unless there are compelling reasons, it would be just and proper that in every case the respondent furnishes entire copy of the investigation report to the charged person. In the present case, instead of furnishing entire copy of the investigation report, documents relied upon in the show cause notices have been furnished to the appellants. It is not the case of appellants that selective findings recorded in the investigation report are only furnished and findings which are in favour of the appellants have not been furnished and thereby prejudice is caused to the appellants. Similarly, contention that incomplete trade/order logs have been furnished to the appellants after granting personal hearing does not enhance the case of the appellants, because admittedly, appellants were called upon to furnish comments in respect thereof and appellants while offering their comments have neither demanded entire copy of the trade/order logs nor sought personal hearing in respect thereof - in the absence of any prejudice caused to the appellants by non supply of full investigation report or trade/order logs, it cannot be said principles of natural justice have been violated. Appellants are neither disputing the relationship between the parties set out in the impugned order, nor they are disputing the contents of the KYC documents. Their only grievance is KYC documents have not been furnished to them. It is relevant to note that no such request for furnishing copies of the KYC documents were made by appellants in their affidavit-in-reply to the show cause notices. No such request was made even during personal hearing. Therefore, in the absence of denial, findings regarding relationship of appellants with RCFL recorded in the impugned orders cannot be faulted - facts revealed during the course of investigation clearly show that appellants as a group have contributed to a new price high/LTP variation and hence action taken against appellants in the impugned order cannot be faulted - in all the transactions there was a time difference of few seconds and the price at which the buy orders and sell orders were placed, were matching in almost all cases with same counterparties. In these circumstances conclusion regarding circular/reversal trades carried out by appellants cannot be faulted - Decided against appellants.
|