Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2014 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2014 (9) TMI 308 - AT - Income TaxBar of limitation in passing assessment order – delay of 47 days - order passed u/s 143(3) - scrutiny assessment – Held that:- The date noted for framing of assessment order is 31.12.2008 but this is disputed by the assessee - the assessment order and demand notice were received by assessee after 47 days, which is beyond the prescribed date of limitation for passing of assessment order u/s. 143(3) of the Act - The assessment was getting time barred as on 31.12.2008 and demand notice and assessment order were served on 16.02.2009 - Where an assessment order has been purported to have been passed within the prescribed period of limitation but the same is served on the assesse after a long delay, without there being an explanation coming forward for such delay, in the absence of any explanation, whatsoever, it can be presumed that the order was not made on the date on which it is purported to have been made - the revenue has not furnished any explanation and has not produced any documentary evidence despite repeated directions on 27.10.2011 and 09.07.2012 that let the assessment records and dispatch records be produced for verification. There is no requirement that service must be effected before the expiry date but there must be evidences to show that assessment order was indeed passed before the limitation - no such evidence has been adduced by revenue that the order was indeed passed on or before 31.12.2008 - evidences are against the revenue that the assessment order and demand notice were dispatched only on 12.02.2009 and the same was served on assessee on 16.02.2009 i.e. beyond 47 days of limitation - There can be postal delay of a week’s time or a fortnight’s time at the maximum and it cannot be 47 days’ delay - in order to make the assessment order complete and effective, it should be issued so as to be beyond the control of the authority concerned for any possible change or modification and this should be done within the limitation period though actual service of the assessment order may be beyond that period - When an assessment order has been purported to have been passed within the prescribed period of limitation but the same is served on the assessee after unreasonable delay without being an explanation coming forward for such delay, in the absence of any explanation whatsoever it can safely be presumed that the order was not made on the date on which it purports to have been made and on the basis of such presumption it can be held that the order was passed after the expiry of limitation - the assessment order was barred by limitation – Decided in favour of assessee.
|