Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2015 (1) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2015 (1) TMI 208 - AT - CustomsClassification of coal - Classification as ‘bituminous coal’ classifiable under CTH 2701 12 00 or as ‘stem coal’ falling under the category of ‘other coal’ (CTH 2701 19 20) - benefit of Sl. No.123 of Notification No.12/2012 Customs - Held that:- The expression ‘steam coal’ has not been defined in Notification No.12/2012 Customs. Hence, understanding in trade parlance should be followed and the benefit of exemption should be extended. - According to technical literature, ARB samples include total moisture (TM). An important preliminary process to prepare the ARB sample of coal for the actual analysis is the removal of surplus moisture from it. It has been specified that sample weighed for analysis shall be air-dried. (Reference: Methods of Analysis of Coal in India by C. Forrester). Since all the analytical determinations are made on air dried samples. For this all the coal as received at the laboratory is calculated from the analysis of the air dried coal. (Reference: Bulletin 638: Methods of analysing and testing coal Bureau of Mines, US department of the Interior). According to James C Speight (Handbook of Coal Analysis), the final report of the analysis should always contain the results on a basis of air-dried coal (i.e. coal in its most stable condition and in which it was analyzed), but for the purposes of classification or comparison, it is often necessary to convert to another basis, such as dry coal, dry, ash free coal, or as-received coal. Whether the calculation of calorific value on air dried basis as done by the department is correct or not - Held that:- Inherent moisture (bed moisture, equilibrium moisture, capacity moisture) is assumed to be the water held within the pore system and capillaries of coal and is not to be identified with residual moisture. Surface moisture (free moisture) is, as the term implies, water held on the surface of the coal. Total moisture is the moisture determined as the loss in weight in an air atmosphere under rigidly controlled conditions of temperature, time, and airflow (ASTM D-3302) and is the sum of inherent moisture and free moisture and is also the sum of the air-dry loss and residual moisture. Air-dry loss moisture is the loss in weight resulting from the partial drying of coal, and. residual moisture is that remaining in the sample after determining the air-dry loss moisture . As-received moisture also is equal to the total moisture, or is the sum of the inherent and free moisture present in the coal at the time of the analysis. Decomposition moisture is produced from the thermal decomposition of organic constituents of coal. Water of hydration of mineral matter is the water that is incorporated into the crystal lattices of the clay and inorganic minerals in coal. No evidence by way of illustration or example was produced before us to show that the formula used by the Revenue for arriving at GCV on a moist mineral free basis is wrong. We have already seen that the submissions as regards the method of calculation are also incorrect and reliance on ASTM D388 is also not correct since it is mainly used for classification and ranking of coal and D388 itself provided that various parameters have to be determined according to the tests and sampling prescribed for the purpose and wherever calculations have to be made, formulae are provided in D 388.. It is the use of one of these formulae that has been done by the Revenue. There is no basis for the submission that the steam coal imported by the appellant ought to have been tested ARB. In most of the cases load port reports have been relied upon and in this case also it is not the submission of the appellants that load port reports submitted by them are wrong. In any case, the appellants cannot disown the load port report on the basis of which even the value of the imported consignment gets determined. After all, the duty element is much less than the value that an importer pays for the goods. That being the position, load port report which is acceptable to both the parties for the purpose of determination of the value and for the purpose of identification of the goods cannot be said to be ignored for the purpose of assessment. In the present case, the load port certificates submitted by the appellants have been accepted and even where tests have been conducted there are no disputes about the results of the test. Therefore we do not find anything wrong. Wherever the goods are of Indonesian origin, duty exemption in terms of Notification No.46/2011-Cus. would be available and may be extended - In the order passed in the case of Coastal Energy Private Ltd. & others (supra), the penalty was set aside and we had indicated to the learned counsel that the order portion relating to confiscation of the goods and imposition of penalty would not be sustained. In spite of this observation, this submission has been made and the learned counsel also had the advantage of the order in the case of Coastal Energy Pvt. Ltd. (supra) and our observation that we will be following that order. Notification No.12/2012-CE (Sl.No.67) extends the benefit of 1% concessional excise duty subject to the condition of not taking credit of inputs and appellants are eligible for this benefit Eligibility of the appellant for the benefit of exemption in the case of imports from Indonesia. If they were to show at least some evidences to substantiate their claim or at least if they were to make an assertion that they have fulfilled all the conditions and they have a certificate with them which is in the format and which fulfills the requirements of statute, we could have and should have considered the eligibility for exemption in respect of imports from Indonesia while determining the amount of pre-deposit. Even then, just because the appellants have stated that their imports from Indonesia are eligible for the benefit of exemption, since we are considering the stay application and not passing a final order, we consider that appellants should not be required to deposit more than the amount liable to be paid by them in respect of imports from Indonesia applying the exemption available for imports from Indonesia with applicable interest. We keep in mind the fact that the coal is used for power generation and is not a consumer durable. We direct the appellants to deposit the entire amount of differential duty payable as worked out in respect of their imports from South Africa and countries other than Indonesia and in respect of imports from Indonesia, the appellants should deposit the entire amount of duty payable as per the rate applicable for imports from Indonesia subject to the condition that the appellants produce the relevant documents to the original adjudicating authority who get the same verified and prima facie if the documents are in accordance with the requirements of statute, the deposit that will be made as per the rates applicable for imports from Indonesia would be sufficient. If there is a dispute on this issue, the same would be taken up at the time of considering the compliance report. We clarify that interest is also required to be deposited - Decided against assesse.
|