9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition on account of Long Term Capital Gain on sale of shares and undisclosed broker's commission. 2. Disallowance of expenses under Section 147. 3. Validity of reassessment proceedings under Section 147 and compliance with statutory conditions under Sections 147 to 151. Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis: 1. Deletion of Addition on Account of Long Term Capital Gain on Sale of Shares and Undisclosed Broker's Commission: The Revenue challenged the deletion of Rs. 19,40,000/- plus Rs. 38,800/- made on account of Long Term Capital Gain on sale of shares and undisclosed broker's commission. The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated proceedings based on information from the Investigation Wing, Agra, alleging fictitious long-term capital gains. The AO added the entire amount as income from other sources and Rs. 38,800/- as expenses for arranging such accommodation entries. The CIT(A) deleted these additions, observing that the AO did not deny the purchase of shares in the preceding year, and no material evidence was found to show that the company or transactions were bogus. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, stating that the AO's conclusion was based on assumptions and lacked positive evidence. The Tribunal emphasized that the burden of proof lies on the Revenue to establish that the documents filed by the assessee were bogus, which the Revenue failed to discharge. 2. Disallowance of Expenses Under Section 147: The assessee contested the disallowance of 10% of expenses amounting to Rs. 13,830/-. However, during the hearing, the assessee's counsel stated that this ground would not be pressed. Consequently, this ground was dismissed as not pressed. 3. Validity of Reassessment Proceedings Under Section 147 and Compliance with Statutory Conditions Under Sections 147 to 151: The assessee challenged the validity of the reassessment proceedings, arguing that the AO borrowed the belief of income escapement without independent enquiry and solely based on general information from the Investigation Wing. The Tribunal noted that the AO must have some material with a live link to form a belief of income escapement. The Tribunal found that the AO had sufficient material to form such a belief and that the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated. The Tribunal also addressed the issue of service of notice under Section 148, concluding that substantial evidence was brought on record to substantiate that the notice was properly served on the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, which relied on several judicial precedents, including the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. Vipin Batra, which supported the validity of the reassessment proceedings. Conclusion: The Tribunal dismissed both the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's cross-objection. The deletion of the addition on account of Long Term Capital Gain and undisclosed broker's commission was upheld, and the reassessment proceedings under Section 147 were deemed valid. The disallowance of expenses was dismissed as not pressed. The Tribunal's decision emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and proper procedural compliance in reassessment proceedings.
|
