Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + AT Companies Law - 2018 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (3) TMI 1604 - AT - Companies LawCorporate insolvency process - Held that:- Mr. Pranshu Paul, advocate accepts notice on behalf of 2nd respondent i.e. Corporate Debtor through Insolvency Resolution Professional. No further notice need be issued on it. 2nd respondent will assist the Court and, if so desire, may file a reply-affidavit within a week. Mr. R. Sudhinder, advocate submits that he will file an application for impleadment on behalf of the ‘Committee of Creditors’ (CoC). He is allowed to do so within a week along with his Vakalatnama. If such an application is filed, then CoC should be treated as 3rd respondent. We are not issuing separate Notice on the 1st respondent who is a member of Committee of Creditors as we are allowing Mr. R. Sudhinder, advocate to appear on behalf of CoC. He may obtain instructions from 1st Respondent and may file reply. Post the case for admission on 23rd March, 2018.
|